Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Think bowl's avatar

Not only did we dodge this bullet, but we created another one. According to some estimates, we produce 3000 kCal of food/day/person globally, which is about a third more than what we actually need. So while we talk about how overpopulation is horrible and we can't feed enough people, we could currently feed 12 billion if the distribution was fair. (Although from an environmental point of view, I think it would make much more sense to produce less food, but that's another topic.)

Expand full comment
Michael A Alexander's avatar

Crooke was right:

"before we are in the grip of actual dearth the chemist will step in and postpone the day of famine to so distant a period that we and our sons and grandsons may legitimately live without undue solicitude for the future."

Chemical fertilizers and improved cultivars did indeed postpone the day of famine such that the grandchildren could legitimately live without undue solicitude for their own children (Boomers) and grandchildren (Millennials).

And during this time, the long-term solution has appeared, fertility decline so that the projected 7 billion in 2000 and its extrapolation to 50 billion in 2100 did not materialize. It now looks like population will peak at less than 20% higher than today's level in the second half of the century.

Famine avoided.

When I was a kid in the early seventies I thought we might go through a sticky bit around 2010, but by the time I was in my 20's I had learned about the Green Revolution and the demographic transition and no longer thought that.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts